Note: Nearly identical testimony was provided to the House Committee on Revenue on 2/25/21 for a similar piece of legislation, HB 2604.
Chair Burdick, Vice-Chair Boquist, and Members of the Committee,
My name is Daniel Hauser, tax policy analyst for the Oregon Center for Public Policy, and I respectfully submit this testimony regarding SB 139.
Pass-through business owners should not pay a lower tax rate on their profits than their employees pay on their wages. This fundamental tenet of equity is why the reduced tax rate for pass-through business owners should be eliminated from Oregon law. This committee should amend SB 139 so that, rather than scaling these reduced tax rates back, they are struck from statute.
Currently, taxpayers reporting an annual pass-through business profit of more than $5 million can see their tax cut reach over $70,000. Under SB 139 these high-income taxpayers would still receive the tax break, though the effective cap would come down to less than $10,000. While this would be an improvement, we would still be putting millions of dollars that could be invested in our schools or other important services to instead subsidize many of the richest 5 percent of Oregonians.
As can be seen in the chart below, nearly seven in 10 dollars from this tax break flow to folks making over half-a-million dollars in a single year; less than one in 10 dollars of the benefits flow to Oregonians making under $200,000.
This tax policy should be eliminated. However, scaling back this subsidy, as SB 139 does, is a move in the right direction. Please amend SB 139 to end this regressive, inequitable, and poorly targeted tax break.