InsideCapitolDome

HB 2009: Business Tax Incentives Compromise

Co-Chairs Meek and Nathanson, Vice-Chairs, and Members of the Committee, My name is Daniel Hauser (he/him), Deputy Director for the Oregon Center for Public Policy and I respectfully submit this testimony in support with amendments of HB 2009 on behalf of the Center. The Oregon Center for Public Policy is a nonpartisan think tank dedicated

HB 2009: Business Tax Incentives Compromise Read More »

InsideCapitolDome

Fix the Kicker

Chair Meek, Vice-Chair Boquist, and Members of the Committee, My name is Daniel Hauser (he/him), Deputy Director for the Oregon Center for Public Policy and I respectfully submit this testimony on Oregon’s kicker policy. The Oregon Center for Public Policy is a nonpartisan think tank dedicated to improving the economic outcomes for all Oregonians, particularly

Fix the Kicker Read More »

Oregonians must protect one of the few taxes on extreme wealth

[This commentary was first published in Street Roots.] Recently, a bipartisan group of lawmakers tried short-circuiting the legislative process to deliver a coup on behalf of Oregon’s wealthiest. They attempted to send a bill repealing Oregon’s estate tax straight to the floor for a vote, skipping the usual review of legislation. Thankfully, the majority rejected this

Oregonians must protect one of the few taxes on extreme wealth Read More »

InsideCapitolDome

Massive tax rebates for the super-rich is not in the best interest of Oregonians

Today’s Oregon Economic and Revenue Forecast confirms that a record-shattering, $5.5 billion kicker is on the way. This unprecedented level of resources going out in tax rebates will do little to address the needs of Oregonians, and instead will further swell the accounts of the richest Oregonians.

Massive tax rebates for the super-rich is not in the best interest of Oregonians Read More »

InsideCapitolDome

(Podcast) Tax policy fuels extreme wealth inequality: two examples

Over the past four-and-a-half decades, we have seen economic inequality return with a vengeance. We’re living through a new Gilded Age, comparable to the one at the turn of the 19th Century. The first Gilded Age was the age of Rockefeller and Carnegie; ours is the age of Bezos and Knight. The return of extreme wealth inequality is the result of public policy choices, not least decisions in how we tax the superrich.

(Podcast) Tax policy fuels extreme wealth inequality: two examples Read More »

Scroll to Top